D
15

The wear difference on a landing gear actuator I saw over just 6 months

I was doing a routine check on a 737-800 last week and had to pull the landing gear actuator for a seal replacement. What got me was comparing it to the same part from another plane that came in 6 months ago. The older one had been serviced every 400 cycles and looked almost new inside. The one I just pulled had gone maybe 700 cycles without a look and the piston rod was scored bad, like someone ran sandpaper down it. Turns out the company switched to a cheaper hydraulic fluid that didn't have the same anti-wear additives. The before and after was night and day. Has anyone else seen a big change in part life after a fluid or lubricant swap?
2 comments

Log in to join the discussion

Log In
2 Comments
maxmurphy
maxmurphy21h agoTop Commenter
holy crap, 700 cycles without a look on a landing gear actuator? that's just asking for trouble man. scoring on the piston rod is the kind of thing that can get you a sudden inspection when you least need it. and the cheap fluid switch is the worst, i've seen that exact thing happen with a hydraulic pump on a regional jet. they saved like 2 cents a gallon and the pumps started failing twice as fast, cost them way more in the long run.
10
anna758
anna75819h ago
And the bean counters never factor in the hidden costs like that.
4