22
Am I the only one who thinks the 'right to repair' fight is missing a huge point about parts?
I was reading a report from a trade group last week, and it said something that really got me. It claimed that for a common 2020 model sedan, over 60% of the parts flagged as 'needing dealer programming' after a simple swap can actually be coded with a $400 scan tool and some patience. The report was from a shop in Tampa that tested it on a bunch of cars. Everyone gets mad about the software locks, and I get that, but I think we're giving up too easy on the hardware side. I've seen guys in my own shop order a whole new module because the computer said it needed 'initialization', when the old one just needed the security code cleared. We're letting the scare tactics win. It makes me wonder how many perfectly good parts get tossed because the info on how to reset them is buried. Has anyone else found a specific part or job where the 'required' dealer step was totally optional?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
gavin_clark2d ago
My old shop used to replace every single TPMS sensor that came in. Honestly, after seeing what @jake_thompson said, I looked up the reset steps online and saved a ton of money last week. We're definitely throwing out good parts because the official info makes it sound too hard.
7
jake_thompson2d ago
Seriously, this is spot on. We had the same thing with a common fuel pump module last month. The shop manual said it needed a dealer flash, but a simple relearn procedure with our basic scanner got it working. That info was buried in a forum, not the official service data.
0