D
5

Honestly, I think skipping the famous trails for random paths is way better. Case in point: my hike to a 'lake' that was just a big puddle.

4 comments

Log in to join the discussion

Log In
4 Comments
carter.sage
Exploring random trails is a great way to find hidden spots, but you gotta check a map first for basic details. A quick look at the contour lines can save you from another disappointing puddle. It’s all about balancing adventure with a tiny bit of planning.
6
oliverp25
oliverp251mo ago
Last spring on the Miller's Pond loop, I skipped checking the contour lines. The map showed a gentle slope, but those tight lines meant a steep drop into a marsh. I spent an hour cleaning mud off my boots. Now I make it a rule to study the map for at least ten minutes before any new trail. It saves time and keeps the adventure fun without the mess.
4
elizabeth_mason28
Yeah, the "gentle slope" thing gets me. Those contour lines can be sneaky if you don't know how to read them right. A wide space between lines is the actual gentle part, tight lines are always a cliff or a super steep climb. I learned that the hard way too, ended up on a rock face that was supposed to be a "gradual incline." A ten minute map study is smart, but you gotta know what you're looking for.
-1
charles_black24
Totally agree, found a "waterfall" once that was just a trickle down some rocks. A quick map check would've saved the trip.
4