A friend argued that removing a post about a local protest was 'just content moderation', not censorship. Happened at a cafe in Austin last month.

2 comments

2 Comments

That's a tough one to agree with. Calling it just moderation feels like a word game. When you take down a post about a protest, you are making a choice about what speech gets heard. It doesn't matter if it's a cafe board or a big website. The end result is the same, the info is gone. That choice to remove it fits the basic idea of censorship, controlling what people can see. Trying to rename it doesn't change what actually happened.

hannaho529d ago

I actually used to defend that kind of stuff as just house rules. But seeing that Austin cafe thing made it click for me. It's not about cleaning up spam, it's about hiding a real event people should know about. Calling it moderation feels like a technicality to avoid the real word. The action is still stopping information from spreading, and that's the core of it. My view on this totally shifted.